Is there substantial evidence 1 supporting the Superior Court's determination that no Fourth Amendment violation was committed?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Henning, 18 Cal.App.3d 872, 96 Cal.Rptr. 294 (Cal. App. 1971):

The question presented is whether there was any substantial evidence 1 supporting the superior court's determination of no Fourth Amendment violation. (People v. Stout, 66 Cal.2d 184, 192, 57 Cal.Rptr. 152, 424 P.2d 704; Bergeron v. Superior Court, 2 Cal.App.3d 433, 436, 82 Cal.Rptr. 711.) If so, even though contrary inferences might be drawn from the evidence, and we ourselves might draw them, we are nevertheless bound by the findings of the superior court.

Other Questions


When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When determining whether there is substantial evidence to support a conviction, what is the test for substantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is there substantial evidence to support the instruction that a judge must only give the instruction which is supported by substantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports the argument that the evidence supports the proposition that there is no evidence supporting the claim? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated "substantial evidence" in determining whether substantial evidence is sufficient? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.