Is there insufficient evidence to support a juvenile court's finding that a juvenile offender committed first degree burglary?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from in M.L. v. M.L., F068454 (Cal. App. 2014):
Appellant contends there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court's finding that he committed first degree burglary. Relying on Mikes v. Borg (9th Cir. 1991) 947 F.2d 353 (Mikes), appellant argues that a fingerprint alone is not enough to show proof when the fingerprint was placed on an object or a particular location. We find appellant's argument unpersuasive and affirm the juvenile court's findings.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence supporting the finding that there is insufficient evidence to support the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding that there is insufficient evidence of premeditation and deliberation to support a finding of first-degree murder? (California, United States of America)
Is there sufficient evidence to support a juvenile court finding that a minor committed second degree robbery? (California, United States of America)
If evidence supports the special-circumstance finding of lying in wait, does that necessarily support the first degree murder verdict based on the theory of lying-in-wait? (California, United States of America)
Is there substantial evidence supporting the jury's finding that defendant committed first degree attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
Is insufficient evidence sufficient to support a jury's finding that there was insufficient evidence? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
If evidence supports the special-circumstance finding of lying in wait, does that necessarily support the first degree murder verdict based on the theory of lying-in-wait? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports the argument that the evidence supports the proposition that there is no evidence supporting the claim? (California, United States of America)
