Is there insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to convict defendant of possession of burglary tools?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Rubio, C074476 (Cal. App. 2014):

Defendant next contends there was insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to convict him of possession of burglary tools. To convict defendant on this charge, the People were required to establish: "(1) possession by the defendant; (2) of tools within the purview of the statute; (3) with the intent to use the tools for the felonious purpose of breaking or entering." (People v. Southard (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 1079, 1084-1085.)

Other Questions


What is the test for a defendant's argument that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction for possession of drugs and possession of a firearm? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that evidence of possession of property stolen during a burglary is sufficient to convict a defendant of the crime? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for review of a conviction for assault and robbery, in what circumstances will the Court uphold the conviction of defendant as a result of insufficient evidence to support the judgment? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant secures on appeal a reversal of his conviction based on insufficiency of evidence, is that defendant subject to a retrial? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that Weizoerick and Ahlo opined the drugs were possessed for sale rather than personal use, rather than possession, are sufficient evidence to convict a defendant of a drug offence? (California, United States of America)
Is a convicted burglar wrongfully convicted because of his co-defendant's prior burglary conviction? (California, United States of America)
Is there insufficient evidence to support a defendant's conviction of possession of narcotics for sale? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial on a charge of sexual assault brought by defendant Perez, who has pleaded not guilty to the charge, is the evidence insufficient to support his claim of insufficiency of evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, how does the Court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a convicted burglar to be convicted of possession of drugs that he was in possession at the time of the burglary? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.