Is there insufficient admissible evidence to convict a defendant on two counts of attempted robbery?

C.D. asserts that there was insufficient admissible evidence to establish his identity as the perpetrator on the count of attempted robbery and also that insufficient evidence demonstrated an intent to rob. On appeal, "[w]e review the entire record in the light most favorable to the judgment below to determine whether it discloses sufficient evidencethat is, evidence that is reasonable, credible, and of solid valuesupporting the decision, and not whether the evidence proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt." (People v. Jennings (2010) 50 Cal.4th 616, 638.)