Is there conclusive evidence that a firearm was not a firearm?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Cowan, B285475 (Cal. App. 2018):

Cowan acknowledges that the witnesses "saw what they claimed appeared to be a real gun," but argues that "none of them provided conclusive evidence that it was, in fact an actual firearm." But "conclusive" evidence is not necessary. We must uphold the jury's verdict if the record contains substantial evidence supporting conviction, that is, "evidence which is reasonable, credible, and of solid value." (People v. Johnson (1980) 26 Cal.3d 557, 578.)

Other Questions


What is the evidence that supports the argument that the evidence supports the proposition that there is no evidence supporting the claim? (California, United States of America)
When an ex-felon commits a crime using a firearm and arrives at the scene already in possession of the firearm, does Section 654 of the Criminal Code bar assault with a firearm? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is there a "situation" where a plaintiff has been ordered to produce evidence under the Arizona Evidence Code under section 402 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the majority's conclusion that sufficient evidence did not establish use of the peak trail violate the fundamental substantial evidence rule? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law that supports a jury's conclusion that other evidence supports the jury's conclusions? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for excluding evidence of a defendant's possession of a loaded firearm under California Evidence Code section 352? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to reach a conclusion that only one reasonable conclusion can be deducible from the evidence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.