California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The People v. Mayers, C060140, No. 06F06419 (Cal. App. 2010):
"[t]he record justifies section 667.6, subdivision (c) consecutive sentences and supports the trial court's discretion in imposing those sentences," there is no cause for remand. (People v. Pena (1992) 7 Cal.App.4th 1294, 1318.)
Defendant contends, and the People concede, the trial court undercalculated the amount of presentence conduct credits. We agree and will modify the abstract of judgment to reflect that defendant is entitled to 119 days of conduct credit, for a total of 914 days of presentence credit. (People v. Scott (1994) 9 Cal.4th 331, 354 [unauthorized sentence may be corrected at any time].)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.