Is there any reason to remand the matter to the trial court?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Phommachanh, C081185 (Cal. App. 2017):
restitution fine pursuant to section 1202.4, subdivision (l). Therefore, we see no reason to remand the matter to the trial court but instead direct, for the reasons stated in People v. High (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 1192, 1200, that the abstract of judgment be corrected to reflect this statutory basis for the surcharge.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have any authority to remand the matter back to the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have any authority to remand the matter to the trial court for resentencing? (California, United States of America)
Is there a need to remand the matter to the trial court for resentencing? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court err when it determined the prosecution exercised reasonable diligence in attempting to secure the victim's attendance at trial? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial, is the trial court bound by the same principles as the court of appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does the majority opinion in the Supreme Court of Canada say that a trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction pending an appeal? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
If a trial court orders testing without articulating its reasons on the record, will the appellate court presume an implied finding of probable cause? (California, United States of America)
