Is there any limitation on cumulative evidence in criminal cases?

Thus, the question before us is not whether the evidence was relevant, but rather whether the evidence of defendant's moniker was unduly prejudicial. (See Evid. Code, 352; In re Romeo C., supra, 33 Cal.App.4th at p. 1843 ["the only ban on cumulative evidence is found in [Evid. Code, 352]"]; People v. Cardenas (1982) 31 Cal.3d 897, 905 ["[The] prosecution has no right to present cumulative evidence which creates a substantial danger of undue prejudice to the defendant"].)