Is there any inalienable right or natural law which might arguably be above the California Constitution?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Olson v. Cory, 134 Cal.App.3d 85, 184 Cal.Rptr. 325 (Cal. App. 1982):
Aside from the federal constitutional provisions, discussed above, there is no inalienable right or natural law which might arguably be above the California Constitution. (See Nougues v. Douglass (1857) 7 Cal. 65, 69-70.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What waiver of appeal rights apply to a criminal defendant who knowingly waives any significant right such as constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Does section 3303, subdivision (g) of the California Civil Rights Act, make a claim of a "constitutional right to silence"? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of section 2600 of the California Civil Rights Act on the rights of detainees? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the California Constitution and the California Assistance of Counsel provisions in criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a person has a right to sue under the California Civil Rights Act? (California, United States of America)
Is there a constitutional right to treatment for a person detained under section 647(f) of the California Mental Health Act? (California, United States of America)
Is there a constitutional right to seek and enforce a right of equal protection and due process? (California, United States of America)
Does admitting evidence pursuant to California Evidence Code section 1237 impermissibly deny defendants their constitutional rights to confrontation and cross-examination? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
