California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Martinez, 158 Cal.App.4th 1324, 70 Cal.Rptr.3d 680 (Cal. App. 2008):
Thus, this is different from People v. Albarran (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 214, 57 Cal.Rptr.3d 92, which discredited the expert's opinion in overturning the gang enhancement. The court noted that during the shooting for which the defendant was convicted, there was no evidence the defendant attempted to gain respect or status: the shooters did not "announce[ ] their presence or purposebefore, during or after the shooting. There was no evidence ... that any gang members had 'bragged' about their involvement or created graffiti and took credit for it." (Id, at p. 227, 57 Cal.Rptr.3d 92.) But contrary to our case, the expert there testified he did not know why the shooting occurred. And there was enough other evidence here supporting the enhancement even if there was no bragging or graffiti.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.