Is there any evidence of a conflict of interest that is discoverable to support a claim that evidence outside the administrative record should be considered upon de novo review?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Waggener v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of America, 238 F.Supp.2d 1179 (S.D. Cal. 2002):

Two district courts have addressed similar discovery issues, finding that information regarding a conflict of interest is discoverable to support the plaintiff's claim that evidence outside the administrative record should be considered upon de novo review. In Sheehan v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 2002 WL 1424592 (S.D.N.Y.2002), plaintiff requested the production of documents and depositions in order to discover whether the defendant plan administrator had a conflict of interest when it terminated plaintiff's disability benefits. The magistrate judge noted that a conflict of interest may constitute good cause to allow the district judge to consider evidence outside

Page 1184

Other Questions


What is the legal test for evidence that supports the argument that an expert can provide evidence in an administrative record review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas review of a claim of insufficiency of evidence in a criminal case, what are the requirements for the federal court to consider all evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas review of a claim of insufficiency of evidence, what is the meaning of the phrase "all evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the prosecution"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas review of a claim of insufficient evidence, what is the meaning of the phrase "all evidence must be considered in the light of the prosecution"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When assessing the evidence presented at trial, does a reviewing court need to conduct a thorough review of the state court record? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law that supports a claim that corroboration is sufficient to support a claim of due process? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing the sufficiency of evidentiary support for a conviction for sexual assault, is the evidence sufficient to support the conviction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any evidence to support a claim of intentional falsification of the official court record? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant bring a conflict of interest claim in a Rule 32 post-conviction review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a petitioner who has procedurally defaulted by not raising a claim on direct review or collateral review barred from raising it on collateral review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.