Is there any error in instructing a jury to consider each of the charges in the same order?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from The People v. Sarem, No.08F04240, No.C061554 (Cal. App. 2011):

The instruction, defendant argues, was error under People v. Kurtzman (1988) 46 Cal.3d 322, and must be considered in light of the court's clear direction to the jury that it is up to the jury to decide the order in which it would consider the charges. It stated: "[I]t is up to you to decide the order in which you consider each greater or lesser crime and the relevant evidence. [] But I cannot accept a verdict of guilty of the lesser crime unless you have found the defendant not guilty of the greater crime." The written copy of the instructions the jury took into deliberation also stated: "It is up to you to decide the order in which you consider each greater and lesser crime and the relevant evidence, but I can accept a verdict of guilty of the lesser crime only if you have found the defendant not guilty of the greater crime."

Page 14

Other Questions


What factors will the court consider in deciding whether to join the murder charge with the domestic violence charge as a separate set of charges under section 954 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the jury be instructed to follow the law as instructed, rather than consider any comments by the prosecutor that conflicted with the trial court's instructions? (California, United States of America)
Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant is convicted of a lesser charge of a greater charge of sexual assault, is the lesser charge necessarily included in the greater charge? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for review of an instruction in the Superior Court of Appeal where the instruction in error was found to be in error? (California, United States of America)
When the error is that the error was not intentional, does the error result in the error not being corrected? (California, United States of America)
Is it sufficient for the jury to consider the error in finding that the jury considered evidence from which it could have come to a verdict without reliance on reliance on the error? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury need to convict a defendant of a lesser charge before the charge requiring acquittal of the greater charge is considered? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to instruct a jury to disregard an instruction in an assault case where the instruction had no antecedent in the facts? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.