The following excerpt is from United States v. Flowers, No. 17-30068, No. 17-30069 (9th Cir. 2019):
Flowers claims the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence from a search of his home. We review a district court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence de novo and review the district court's factual findings for clear error. United States v. Job, 871 F.3d 852, 859 (9th Cir. 2017). The district court did not err in denying the motion to suppress because the affidavit supporting the search warrant contained ample evidence to find probable cause to support the warrant. See
Page 3
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.