California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Sinclair, D073786 (Cal. App. 2019):
very type of witness that requires, but is likely not to appear to submit to, cross-examination before a jury."].) As we discuss post, Adam was not the sole witness to the crime; his testimony was largely cumulative as there were several eyewitnesses, and a video surveillance camera captured the incident. We agree with Sinclair that the prosecution should have notified defense counsel sooner, but we do not believe the prosecution's actions as a whole were "desultory and indifferent." (People v. Mendieta (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 1032, 1039.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.