Is there any case law where an expert testimony was not admitted for the purpose of determining whether an expert should be allowed to testify at trial?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Bronston, 658 F.2d 920 (2nd Cir. 1981):
The expert testimony which defendant sought to introduce should have been admitted for this purpose. United States v. Garvin, 565 F.2d 519, 522-23 (8th Cir. 1977). The district court's summary rejection of this testimony with the comment "We are trying a case, not a breach of ethics," was prejudicial error.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a party’s intention is a determining factor in determining whether there is a contract for services? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is there any case law where a jury was asked to consider whether there was a factual determination to be made by the trial court on whether to reread testimony? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether age was a determining factor in determining whether a plaintiff should be retained or discharged? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What factors are considered to determine whether inducement was a factor in determining whether an individual was entrapped in a criminal case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a trial judge's conduct deprived a defendant of a fair trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has considered each of the factors that determine whether they have been found liable for damages? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff's trial counsel was ineffective because the petitioner's desire to testify was overrode? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When there has not been a psychiatric evaluation, hearing or judicial determination of competence, when there has been no evidentiary review of the record, what is the test for determining whether defendant Lowenstein is competent to stand trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the fact that a witness testified untruthfully at a previous trial constitute a finding that he is testifying perjuriously at trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a witness who testified for the government is an "interested party" in a trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
