California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Sul, 122 Cal.App.3d 355, 175 Cal.Rptr. 893 (Cal. App. 1981):
In State v. Thomas (1973) 110 Ariz. 120, 515 P.2d 865, the witness was apparently hospitalized at the time of the trial. The court examined him and concluded that "it is obvious that the man is incapable of testifying" which finding was amply supported by excerpts from the witness' testimony. (Id., 515 P.2d at p. 870.)
In United States v. Brasco (S.D.N.Y. 1974) 385 F.Supp. 964, a witness refused to testify for reasons which appeared on the record in camera but not divulged in the written opinion. He was adjudged in civil contempt on Thursday, June 27, 1974, and given until Monday, July 1 to either purge himself of contempt or to show cause why he should not be found guilty of criminal
Page 899
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.