Is there any case law where a jury has been told that the facts could not have been found beyond a reasonable doubt?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Gauthier, D066986 (Cal. App. 2016):
fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.' " (Ibid.) In the face of conflicting testimony, it is solely up to the jury to decide which testimony to credit. (People v. Young, supra, 34 Cal.4th at p. 1181.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a minor guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant inquiry in determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which a jury has found that any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
