Is there any case law where a jury found that there was credible and compelling evidence of negligence?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Hughes v. Pham, E052469 (Cal. App. 2015):
The foregoing is clearly substantial evidence the jury was entitled to find credible and which is sufficient to meet plaintiffs' burden to prove that defendant's negligence was a substantial factor in causing plaintiffs' damages. It is irrelevant that there was also evidence to the contrary. (Howard v. Owens Corning, supra, 72 Cal.App.4th at p. 631.)
Page 35
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports the argument that the evidence supports the proposition that there is no evidence supporting the claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence supporting a finding that a person who was found guilty of sexual assault by reason of abuse has been found guilty by a jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion where the Court of Appeal found that a lower court found that there was insufficient evidence to support the Plaintiff's claim? (California, United States of America)
Is there a "situation" where a plaintiff has been ordered to produce evidence under the Arizona Evidence Code under section 402 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
In what cases have off duty "off duty" police officers been found liable for negligence by the courts for negligent discharge? (California, United States of America)
Is there insufficient evidence of malice in the case of a defendant who was found guilty of assault by reason of gross negligence? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that the jury was entitled to consider in determining whether there was evidence of negligence against defendant? (California, United States of America)
