Is there any case law where a defense counsel has been found to show force and fear on cross-examination?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Montero, 185 Cal.App.3d 415, 229 Cal.Rptr. 750 (Cal. App. 1986):

Regardless, we have found sufficient evidence in the record absent the testimony elicited by defense counsel on the December 20, 1981 and September 21, 1984 incidents to show force and fear. Thus, even assuming incompetence of counsel, it is not probable a more favorable result would [185 Cal.App.3d 427] occur on remand in the absence of the evidence adduced on cross-examination. (People v. Watson (1956) 46 Cal.2d 818, 836-837, 299 P.2d 243.)

Other Questions


Is a prosecutor's comment that defense counsel was seeking to "distract the jury from the evidence as an attack on counsel's integrity a fair response to defense counsel's remarks? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defense counsel has been found to have made a personal attack on the integrity of the defense counsel? (California, United States of America)
If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor impugently call the integrity of defense counsel by asserting defense counsel would lose their bar cards if they argued in favor of voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Does trial counsel shirk his constitutional responsibility to provide competent counsel by failing to ask the court to instruct on a bogus self-defense defense? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor asks a defense counsel a question in voir dire about rape and sexual assault, is the defense counsel's failure to object to the questions? (California, United States of America)
Can defense counsel argue that defense counsel failed to object to the foregoing procedure or request that written instructions be provided to the jury? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor criticizes a defense attorney's conduct at trial, can the prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct if the prosecutor's arguments are not in the context of the defense counsel's conduct? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court require a defense counsel to object to a motion where the trial atmosphere was poisonous, and the defense counsel did not object at all? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor commit misconduct if he or she attacks the integrity of defense counsel or casts aspersions on defense counsel? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.