California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Cadle Company II, Inc. v. Cisneros, E042731 (Cal. App. 6/30/2008), E042731 (Cal. App. 2008):
Defendant raises a similar complaint that the movant's separate statement of undisputed facts did not separately identify the undisputed matters to each individual cause of action in the complaint. Defendant urges that Code of Civil Procedure "section 437c is unforgiving," and argues that "a failure to comply with any one of its myriad requirements is likely to be fatal to the offending party." (Brantley v. Pisaro (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 1591, 1607.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.