Is there any case law where a defendant is convicted of burglary and robbery and then served his sentence for the same crime?

Percelle involved a comparable situation. There the defendant was convicted of burglary and robbery; the sentence for robbery was stayed and he served his term for burglary. The information in the case on appeal alleged the robbery as the prior prison term and the enhancement was found true. The appellate court ruled the enhancement based on the robbery had to be stricken. The defendant was not given the notice required by due process that the robbery conviction was the basis for the enhancement. (People v. Percelle, supra, 126 Cal.App.4th at p. 178.)