The following excerpt is from Mali v. Fed. Ins. Co., Docket No. 11-5413-cv (Lead), Docket No. 12-0174-cv (XAP) (2nd Cir. 2013):
Eng'rs, 776 F.2d 383, 390 (2d Cir. 1985). There is some support for a narrow exception to this rule for cases that have been prosecuted in bad faith. See Eisemann v. Greene, 204 F.3d 393, 395-96 (2d Cir. 2000). For such cases, we have said that the order to shift fees must be justified by a finding supported by clear evidence that (1) the offending party's claims were entirely without color, and (2) the offending party's claims were made in bad faith. See id. at 396. Furthermore, the trial court has very broad discretion to deny an application to shift fees. See id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.