California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Ruiz, 232 Cal.Rptr.3d 714, 4 Cal.5th 1100, 417 P.3d 191 (Cal. 2018):
Instead, as noted above, the People rely on our decision in Athar , but that decision does not support their argument. There, we held that sentence enhancements prescribed for a money laundering conviction apply to offenders convicted of conspiring to commit money laundering. ( Athar , supra , 36 Cal.4th at p. 398, 30 Cal.Rptr.3d 570, 114 P.3d 806.) As the People observe, toward the end of the opinion, we stated that Penal Code section 182"requires sentencing to the same extent as the underlying target offense." ( Id . at p. 406, 30 Cal.Rptr.3d 570, 114 P.3d 806.) However, we made this statement in the context of endorsing People v. Villela (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 54, 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 253 insofar as it looked to whether a prescribed consequence for the underlying target offense "was a punishment" to determine if
[4 Cal.5th 1107]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.