Is there any case law that bars evidence that makes conviction more likely because it provokes an emotional response in the jury?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Rosales-DeEvangelista, 39 F.3d 1190 (9th Cir. 1994):
Rule 403 bars evidence that "makes conviction more likely because it provokes an emotional response in the jury or otherwise tends to affect adversely the jury's attitude toward the defendant wholly apart from its judgment as to his guilt or innocence of the crime charged." United States v. Bailleaux, 685 F.2d 1105, 1111 (9th Cir.1982).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is the evidence insufficient to support any of the 12 convictions for conspiracy to make false statements, making, and aiding and abetting in making false statements to federally insured financial institutions? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Are there any cases where the Supreme Court has found that criminal convictions for common law crimes against individuals who have not been convicted of criminal convictions are sufficient grounds for criminal convictions? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the case law in which the jury is asked to consider evidence of prejudicial prejudice in a jury trial where the evidence of guilt is overwhelming? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to overturn a jury's finding that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's verdict? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a jury convicted Driggers of the murder of his ex-wife by reason of interstate travel, can the jury convict him of the crime even if the interstate travel was utterly unrelated to the murder scheme? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any 'weak evidence before the jury' or 'strong evidence'? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a Minister's delegate erred by misapplying the so-called "two-part test" in determining that a convicted criminal must be convicted of certain crimes and that the convicted person is or will be a danger to the public? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the legal test for a jury to convict a defendant on the evidence of an accomplice who changed the form of the stolen property to a different type of vehicle? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a jury convict a defendant on a conspiracy charge based on evidence of an overt act that is not specified in the indictment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant challenge his conviction for conspiracy to pervert the course of justice by challenging the sufficiency of evidence to support his conviction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
