The following excerpt is from Cifuentes v. Ceva Logistics United States, Inc., Case No.: 16-CV-01957-H-DHB (S.D. Cal. 2017):
The superiority inquiry requires determination of "whether objectives of the particular class action procedure will be achieved in the particular case." Hanlon, 150 F.3d at 1023 (citation omitted). Notably, the class-action method is considered to be superior if "classwide litigation of common issues will reduce litigation costs and promote greater efficiency." Valentino v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., 97 F.3d 1227, 1234 (9th Cir. 1996) (citation omitted). Here, there is no evidence that absent class members wish to pursue their claims individually. Moreover, any class member who wants to pursue an individual claim may elect not to participate in the settlement agreement. (Proposed Settlement 53.) Accordingly, the superiority requirement is met here.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.