Is there any case law supporting a claim of excessive medical review?

Menges asserts the award of costs was unreasonable because it was for unnecessary medical records review. Her assertions, however, are unsupported by factual or legal citations. As a result, she fails to carry her burden to demonstrate abuse of discretion. " To demonstrate error, appellant must present meaningful legal analysis supported by citations to authority and citations to facts in the record that support the claim of error. [Citations.] [Citation.] Mere suggestions of error without supporting argument or authority other than general abstract principles do not properly present grounds for appellate review. [Citation.] Hence, conclusory claims of error will fail. [Citation.]" ( Multani v. Witkin & Neal (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 1428, 1457, 155 Cal.Rptr.3d 892.)