Is there any case law or case law concerning intent to defraud?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Atlanta Corporation v. Olesen, 124 F. Supp. 482 (S.D. Cal. 1954):

Atlanta contends there was no proof of intent to defraud and that there was error in the examiner's refusal to permit Atlanta to offer evidence on the question of intent to defraud. Reilly v. Pinkus, supra, disposes of this problem. There the court said, 338 U.S. at page 276, 70 S.Ct. at page 114:

Other Questions


Does the jury instruction that "intent to defraud" means an intent to deceive or cheat? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any concern for judicial economy or concern about judicial economy? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does a conviction for possession of an illicit item with intent to defraud apply to a defendant who was convicted only for the possession of the prohibited item? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for intent to defraud? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a defendant who pleads guilty to wire fraud have the specific intent to defraud? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has been intentionally intentionally treated for mental health issues? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the presumption that a person who makes a statement of intent to injure another person be liable for damages if that statement contains two statements of intent? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a criminal offence requires only general criminal intent, can evidence of specific intent or knowledge be obtained under Rule 404(b)? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is intent to injure or defraud sufficient to support a conviction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on intent to defraud? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.