The following excerpt is from Youngberg v. Bekins Co., 930 F. Supp. 1396 (E.D. Cal. 1996):
It may be suggested that because the statute does not explicitly use the terms "indemnity suit," the issue is one of an implied right of action under the principles first announced in Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 95 S.Ct. 2080, 45 L.Ed.2d 26 (1975).9 For the
[930 F. Supp. 1402]
reasons set forth above, I do not agree. Nonetheless, even if that were the issue, this court would arrive at the same conclusion.[930 F. Supp. 1402]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.