Is there an immediate need to secure the gun?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hill, F073321, F073343 (Cal. App. 2018):
child].) No evidence was presented at the suppression hearing that there was an immediate need to secure the gun or that "there was insufficient time to obtain a warrant" for the gun (People v. Camilleri, supra, 220 Cal.App.3d at p. 1206).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Are searches and seizures by private security employees of a private security company, such as those conducted by the National Security Agency, considered unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
Does a search warrant need to be obtained immediately or immediately at the police station? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a widow seeking restoration of her Social Security benefits under the Social Security Act after the annulment of her previous marriage? (California, United States of America)
What is the statute of limitations for a fraud-related crime of grand theft, elder theft, securities fraud and sales of unqualified or nonexempted securities? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a particular governmental invasion of personal security of a defendant's personal security? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a school security officer be considered a "special needs" security officer? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of affirmative action apply to private security services? (California, United States of America)
Does a witness have to disclose that defendant's cell is in the maximum security area of the jail? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for determining whether an investment is a security or an investment contract? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1950.5(f) of the California Statutory Guidelines for the purpose of recovering security deposits from a recalcitrant landlord? (California, United States of America)
