Is there an abuse of discretion by the trial court in deciding whether to uphold a conviction for driving without the owner's consent?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Huber, D075940 (Cal. App. 2020):

Applying this analysis here, we see no abuse of discretion by the trial court. Huber's California convictions for taking a vehicle without the owner's consent (Veh. Code, 10851) and being a felon in possession of a firearm (Pen. Code, 12025) are both crimes of moral turpitude. (People v. Rodriguez (1986) 177 Cal.App.3d 174,

Page 30

Other Questions


How do courts review a trial court's ruling on whether an examiner's question calls for a speculative answer under the abuse of discretion standard? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant be able to argue that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing testimony about two prior convictions subject to the conditions the court imposed? (California, United States of America)
How has the court considered abuse of discretion in deciding whether or not to allow evidence of abuse of power to be used in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion to exclude evidence that supports a plaintiff's claim of failure to give informed consent? (California, United States of America)
Does a restitution order for abuse of discretion constitute an abuse of the court's discretion? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to dismiss one or both of appellant's prior strike convictions, can appellant appeal against the finding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion to exclude prejudicial evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.