The following excerpt is from Rood v. Swarthout, No. 2:12-cv-01476 AC P (E.D. Cal. 2019):
Wade, 388 U.S. at 222. It necessarily follows that there can be no violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), as Miranda is based on the Fifth Amendment privilege against
Page 16
compulsory incrimination. Accordingly, this claim fails under either de novo or AEDPA reasonableness review.
IV. Claim Four: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
A. Petitioner's Allegations
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.