Is there a separate intent and objective for each offence within the meaning of Penal Code section 654?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The People v. Kidd, H034496, No. SS090761A (Cal. App. 2010):
Whether there was a separate intent and objective for each offense within the meaning of Penal Code section 654 is a factual determination that must be upheld on appeal if it is supported by substantial evidence. (People v. Osband (1996) 13 Cal.4th
Page 20
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Whether there was a single intent and objective within the meaning of section 654? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant who has been convicted of multiple sexual offences against the same victim entitled to a full, separate and consecutive sentence under section 667.6 of the California Penal Code, pursuant to section 1170.1? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant who has been convicted of multiple sexual offences against the same victim entitled to a full, separate and consecutive sentence under section 667.6 of the California Penal Code, section 1170.1? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for whether a defendant possessed multiple objectives and intents within the meaning of section 654 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who has been given a life sentence for an assault with intent to murder be convicted of the crime under section 12022(a) of the Penal Code section 120 22(b) and section 5.5 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Code of Criminal Code require a separate intent and objective for each sex offence? (California, United States of America)
Can a convicted sex offender be sentenced to life imprisonment under section 667.67.51, subdivision (c) of the California Penal Code for a conviction of lewd or lascivious acts and finding of two prior convictions within the meaning of Section 67.51? (California, United States of America)
Can a reasonable trier of fact find duress within the meaning of subdivision (b) of section 288 of Section 288 of the California Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code require a defendant to have a separate intent and objective for each offence? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Penal Code allow for an act or omission that is punishable by different sections of the Penal Code to be punished by one or more sections? (California, United States of America)
