Is there a reasonable suspicion that defendant was armed and dangerous?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. N.P. (In re N.P.), A155677 (Cal. App. 2019):
The fact that defendant matched the description given in the dispatch, without more, does not provide reasonable suspicion he was armed and dangerous. Florida v.
Page 6
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Are detentions based on reasonable suspicion or reasonable suspicion lawful? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a reasonable suspicion to stop based on nervous and evasive conduct in high crime area? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reason why a jury convicted a defendant of murder by reason of premeditation rather than felony? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant can reasonably have reasonably anticipated the events leading up to the action? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's reasonableness of their conduct is reasonable? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
