Is there a reasonable possibility that there has been an abuse of discretion in a claim?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Ari-Pfop 1, LLC v. Fleischer, G050857 (Cal. App. 2016):
discretion and we reverse; if not, there has been no abuse of discretion and we affirm. [Citations.] The burden of proving such reasonable possibility is squarely on the plaintiff. [Citation.]" (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there a reasonable possibility that the court may have abused its discretion to grant a restraining order? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for "abuse of discretion" in cases involving abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Is there a reasonable possibility that the court may have abused its discretion to grant an amended Complaint? (California, United States of America)
Is abuse of discretion an abuse of the discretion test? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving reasonable possibility that there is a reasonable possibility of a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have discretion to admit evidence of abuse of power or abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of discretion in determining whether a judge abused discretion in finding that a plaintiff's photographs were prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
Does a restitution order for abuse of discretion constitute an abuse of the court's discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion to exclude evidence that supports a plaintiff's claim of failure to give informed consent? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
