The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Huerta, 106 F.3d 410 (9th Cir. 1997):
Huerta's argument is meritless. The quantity of drugs a defendant conspired to distribute is not an element of a violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a), 846. See United States v. Castaneda, 9 F.3d 761, 769 (9th Cir.1993). The district court, therefore, was not required to establish the quantity of cocaine and marijuana Huerta conspired to distribute as part of the factual basis of the plea under Rule 11(f).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.