4 I cannot accede to this submission. If, as was established in Bates v. Stubbs the imposition of both terms is considered just so as to correct the imbalance between the parties which arises because of the plaintiff being given a medical report which would ordinarily be privileged, then it is no answer that the defendants already have most of the medical information in the plaintiff's hands. If the letter is relevant, it should, normally, be subject to the usual conditions for production.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.