Is the evidence sufficient to support a jury's finding that defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the victim was developmentally disabled?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. MORRIS, C060358, No. SF108255A (Cal. App. 2010):

In my view, the evidence is also sufficient to support the jury's finding that defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the victim of his crime was developmentally disabled. (People v. Prince (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1179, 1251 [in assessing the sufficiency of the evidence, we presume in support of the judgment the existence of every fact that the trier of fact could reasonably deduce from the evidence].)

Other Questions


Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to find that there was sufficient evidence to support a finding that defendants would have or should have known that retaliation was likely to occur? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to appeal against a jury's finding that there was no substantial evidence to support the jury's verdict, does the appellate court have any power to substitute the findings of the jury? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant appeal against a finding that the evidence sufficient to support the jury's findings? (California, United States of America)
Is Defendant's argument that the evidence presented to the jury was insufficient sufficient to support the jury's findings? (California, United States of America)
Is there sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding that there was sufficient evidence for a reversal of judgment? (California, United States of America)
What is sufficient evidence to have been sufficient evidence for a jury to find that defendant intentionally poisoned a patient? (California, United States of America)
What evidence supports a jury's finding that defendant used excessive force in defending himself against Matthew? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is there sufficient evidence to support a jury's implicit conclusion the victim was alive when defendant committed sodomy? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.