Is the admission or exclusion of evidence reviewed for abuse of evidence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Huerta, F066497 (Cal. App. 2014):

As noted above, the admission or exclusion of evidence is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. (People v. Brown, supra, 77 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1337-1338.)

Other Questions


What is the abuse of the abuse standard for exclusion of evidence under section 1154 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in the context of hearsay or abuse of discretion on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of abuse of the abuse of evidence for the purpose of motive and consciousness of guilt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for abuse of discretion in the context of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion concerning the admissibility of evidence subject to review for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Is abuse of discretion a factor in the admission or exclusion of evidence in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissibility of evidence under the deferential abuse standard of review? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of a court's rulings on the admission and exclusion of evidence for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on admissibility of evidence including requests for judicial notice? (California, United States of America)
What are some of the rulings on the admissibility of evidence in cases involving abuse of evidence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.