Is Sidman entitled to a full review of the evidence against him?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from United States v. Sidman, 470 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir. 1973):
Since Sidman complains of the sufficiency of the evidence against him, a review of such evidence in the light most favorable to the Government is in order. Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942); United States v. Magana, 453 F.2d 414, 415 (9th Cir. 1972).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In reviewing verdicts for sufficiency of the evidence, what are the guidelines used by the courts in reviewing the evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
For the purposes of denying a motion for judicial review of a decision by the Board of Arbitration for Justice denying an application to review the denial of the motion, in what circumstances will the motion be reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas review of a claim of insufficient evidence, what is the meaning of the phrase "all evidence must be considered in the light of the prosecution"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In reviewing the application of a sophisticated means enhancement, what is the difference between a de novo review and a clear error review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How is the admission of evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is patent unreasonableness the appropriate standard in reviewing evidence at a review of a severe and prolonged disability analysis? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
When assessing the evidence presented at trial, does a reviewing court need to conduct a thorough review of the state court record? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the legal test for evidence that supports the argument that an expert can provide evidence in an administrative record review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a petitioner who has procedurally defaulted by not raising a claim on direct review or collateral review barred from raising it on collateral review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in a sexual assault case, what is the test for a finding that the evidence was insufficient? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
