California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Vega, E060724 (Cal. App. 2015):
To interpret Penal Code section 1170.18, subdivision (m), as allowing automatic resentencing would be to render subdivisions (a) and (b) surplusage because a defendant already sentenced for a Proposition 47 qualifying crime would not have to file, as subdivisions (a) and (b) require, a petition for recall of sentence. This would defy the basic principle of statutory construction that language should be construed in the context of the overall statutory scheme as a whole, and that significance should be given to every word, phrase, sentence, and part of an act pursuant to the legislative purpose. (People v. Canty (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1266, 1276-1277.) Penal Code section 1170.18, subdivision (m), simply protects defendants who have already been sentenced from being forced to choose between filing a petition for recall of sentence and pursuing remedies to which
Page 25
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.