Is Rule 7.14 an exaggerated response to a security problem?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Aziz v. LeFevre, 642 F.2d 1109 (2nd Cir. 1981):
In this case, development and clarification of the material issues of fact may enable the plaintiffs to show that the promulgation of Rule 7.14 was an "exaggerated response" to a security problem, Bell v. Wolfish, supra, 441 U.S. at 551, 99 S.Ct. at 1880, rather than the exercise of "considered judgment" or "informed discretion" that is "consistent with the inmates' status
Page 1113
* Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law where an applicant has been denied a security classification because he never received the scoring matrix that was used in reassessing his security classification? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What obligations does a securities professional have to investigate the securities they sell? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a beneficiary's marriage to a spouse entitled to Social Security benefits under the Social Security Benefits Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a total ban on the possession of religious medallions an exaggerated response? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a broker-dealer that makes a securities trade without disclosing a conflict of interest violate federal securities law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a minimum security inmate have a constitutionally-based liberty interest in being assigned to or remaining in the minimum security facility? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the case law on national security and international relations in the context of national security considerations? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the role of a securities class action in the enforcement of federal securities laws change? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the government's use of analogies to enable jurors unfamiliar with securities trading to evaluate evidence in the context of securities trading constitute advocacy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a reduction in a defendant's offender level for acceptance of responsibility constitute an entitlement to reduction in his offense level for accepting responsibility? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
