Is Respondent to Respondent's interpretation of the meaning of the word "inappropriate use" in the context of the definition of an individual's right to sue?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Erb v. Superior Court, 205 Cal.App.3d 1156, 252 Cal.Rptr. 881 (Cal. App. 1988):
Respondent's contrary interpretation, which appears derived from certain language in Malcolm v. Superior Court, supra, 29 Cal.3d at pages 529-530, 174 Cal.Rptr. 694, 629 P.2d 495, is incorrect.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word "interpretation" in the context of a section of the California Workers' Comp. Act? (California, United States of America)
Is a city's interpretation of a section of the California Civil Code interpreted in the context of an administrative agency's interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the California Civil Code in the context of "Liberal interpretation"? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpreting the meaning of the word "reasonable and common sense interpretation" in the context of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word "surrounding the interrogation" in the context of the Miranda rights? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for assessing the meaning of the word "interpretation" in the context of a statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)
Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word "inappropriate use" in the context of sexual assault legislation? (California, United States of America)
