Is Reese entitled to a transcript of opening statements and closing arguments in his civil case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Reese, B253610 (Cal. App. 2015):
As noted, Reese contends the denial of the transcript of opening statements and closing arguments violated his equal protection rights under the federal and state Constitutions. Because the facts are not disputed, we independently review whether a constitutional violation has occurred. (People v. Uribe (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 836, 856-857.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is Reese entitled to a transcript of the opening and closing arguments of his civil case? (California, United States of America)
In closing argument in a personal injury case, can the court admonish the appellant for failing to object to any statements in closing argument? (California, United States of America)
In closing argument in a personal injury case, can the court admonish the appellant on appeal for failing to object to any statements in closing argument? (California, United States of America)
Do opening and closing statements constitute evidence in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
Are there any cases that support the argument that a person who is not a plaintiff in a civil case is entitled to be considered a witness? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to an admonition for failing to object to all but one of the Prosecutor's remarks in opening statement and closing argument? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, in what circumstances would the jury have considered a defense counsel's closing argument that the prosecutor's rebuttal to the closing argument had the trial court sustained an objection? (California, United States of America)
In a federal civil case, in what circumstances will a federal prosecutor be found to have improperly challenged statements in his closing argument? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
