California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. McPeters, B238758 (Cal. App. 2013):
In some cases, provocation may exist for second degree murder but be insufficient for manslaughter because second degree murder provocation is only determined under a subjective test, whereas voluntary manslaughter provocation must satisfy both a subjective and an objective test. That is, the existence of provocation to negate deliberation and premeditation and reduce the crime to second degree murder from first degree murder rests on a subjective evaluation of the defendant's actual state of mind. (People v. Fitzpatrick (1992) 2 Cal.App.4th 1285, 12951296.) In contrast, provocation that negates malice and reduces the crime to voluntary manslaughter also requires a determination that a reasonable person under like circumstances would have reacted with deadly passion. (Ibid.) Thus, a defendant who is subjectively precluded from deliberating because of provocation is guilty of second degree rather than first degree murder, even if a reasonable person would not have been so precluded. (Ibid.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.