California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Carroll v. City of S.F., 254 Cal.Rptr.3d 519, 41 Cal.App.5th 805 (Cal. App. 2019):
Having decided that plaintiffs disparate treatment claim is timely as set forth herein, we turn to her disparate impact claim. Citing a lack of governing authority in California regarding the accrual of disparate impact claims, the parties agree that Lewis v. Chicago (2010) 560 U.S. 205, 130 S.Ct. 2191, 176 L.Ed.2d 967 ( Lewis ) should guide our analysis of whether plaintiffs disparate impact claim is timely.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.