Is petitioner permitted to continue to argue that it is now too late for him to pursue his claim in the Court of Appeal?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Lull v. California, No. 2:17-cv-1673-MCE-EFB P (E.D. Cal. 2018):

Finally, petitioner is not excused from exhaustion by an argument that it is now too late to present his claims in state court. See Edwards v. Carpenter, 529 U.S. 446, 453 (2000) ("The purposes of the exhaustion requirement, we said, would be utterly defeated if the prisoner were able to obtain federal habeas review simply by 'letting the time run' so that state remedies were no longer available.").

Page 4

IV. Conclusion

Other Questions


If a habeas petitioner has not been presented to the state's highest court of appeal, can he continue to pursue his claim in state court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a petitioner who has had a full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court seek to have those claims reviewed by the federal appeals court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can the Court of Appeal hear appeals from interlocutory orders of the district court which grant, continue, modify, or dissolve injunctions? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a state attorney permitted to pursue in the court of appeals a claim of legal error by a magistrate judge of the 9th Circuit? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the timing of a motion for attorney's fees and costs in the wake of the Court of Appeal's decision of appeal against the Supreme Court of Justice's decision to dismiss the appeal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a habeas petitioner who has defaulted on his federal claims in a state court have to continue to seek relief in a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a claim is brought by a plaintiff before the Court of Appeal of the Superior Court of Justice from the State of New York is heard by a federal judge, what effect does this have on the appeal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.