Is Orozco entitled to a new trial because the trial court admitted into evidence incriminating statements he made to sheriff's deputies while in jail that violated his Miranda rights?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Orozco, B284024 (Cal. App. 2019):
Orozco contends he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court admitted into evidence incriminating statements he made to sheriff's deputies while in jail that violated his Miranda rights. (Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda).) We disagree with his contention and affirm the judgment (as modified to correct clerical errors in omitting restitution and parole revocation fines).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In reviewing a claim that the Miranda rights were violated, how have courts reviewed the evidence in the context of Miranda rights claims? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a trial court's decision on the Miranda issue, does the court have to agree that a statement was obtained in violation of the Miranda Act? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court erred by admitting statements by a minor regarding his knowledge of right and wrong that were obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where the trial court admitted evidence of evidence from two separate police interviews in violation of the Miranda principles? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on the right of a trial court to exclude or admit relevant evidence under section 352 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
Does admitting into evidence of volunteered statements by a defendant prior to his having been advised of his rights under the Federal Constitution violate such rights? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances of the crime scene evidence will be admitted during the penalty phase of a penalty trial, does the trial court error not to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Can a statement obtained in violation of the Miranda rights be admitted as evidence in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
If defendant has no right to present the evidence at trial, has he not established a violation of his right to a fair trial? (California, United States of America)
