Is depositing the presumptively excluded funds into the sole name of the party claiming the exclusion entirely, but which account is used for family expenses?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from M.P.M. v A.C.M, 2022 BCSC 122 (CanLII):
Nonetheless, I have not been provided with any authority that would support the proposition that simply depositing the presumptively excluded funds into an account owned in the sole name of the party claiming the exclusion, but which account is used for family expenses, is sufficient to lose the exclusion entirely. As I understand the authorities, an inheritance may lose its status as excluded property when those funds are deposited into an account owned jointly by the spouses or into an account owned solely by the other spouse. Whether the funds lose their status as excluded property is founded on the principle of advancement and turns upon the intention found behind the transfer to the other spouse. For example, in Venables v. Venables, 2019 BCCA 281, Griffin J.A. said the following:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a warranty exclusion exclusion of economic loss excluded from the warranty exclusion? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party recover in restitution where another party has been unjustly enriched at that party's expense? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that some funds may have been transferred to the joint account of a joint account with a different bank account make up for the failure to plead or lead evidence on false statement and inducement? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a successful party have the right to claim special costs when the successful party is in a relationship with an opposing party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for proving that a party is not a party to a claim of family debt? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a party seeking to change the date on which to value family property or family debt under the Family Law Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an unsuccessful party to a small claims action be required to pay any other reasonable charges or expenses such as experts’ fees or expenses? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a strata corporation add additional parties to its counterclaim and a third party claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for exclusion of a party while another party is giving evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
