What is the test for imputing income to a party for intentional under-employment?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from K.P.O. v. C.L.O, 2017 BCSC 187 (CanLII):

The court has discretion to impute income to a party for intentional under-employment under s. 19 of the Federal Child Support Guidelines. The test is one of reasonableness having regard to the party’s capacity to earn income in light of age, education, health, work history and work availability: Marquez v. Zapiola, 2013 BCCA 433 at para. 37. I would add that the court should also consider the party’s child care responsibilities before imputing income to that party.

Other Questions


Is a party intentionally underemployed or unemployed intentionally imputing income under section 19(1)(a) of the Employment Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the intention or understanding of a party to a transaction where a party intended to transfer a vehicle to another party? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court impute income for the purposes of imputing income? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party’s income for income tax purposes considered income for purposes of determining child support obligations? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for imputing income for intentional under-employment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the circumstances of the parties into their 70’s and 80s be considered equalized in the context of equalization of income between the parties in their 70s and 90s? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for imputing income for intentional under employment or unemployment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a finding of bad faith on the part of the spouse in a claim for imputation of income for intentional unemployment or under employment require bad faith? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court impute income to a spouse or former spouse under section 19 of the Income Tax Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proof against a self-employed professional who is seeking to impute income to the other party? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.