Is it reasonable to argue that the work involved is difficult?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Riverside County v. Palm-Ramon Development Co., 43 Cal.Rptr. 620 (Cal. App. 1965):
It is, of course, no legitimate objection to the application of the method of assessment prescribed in the basic cases above cited that the work involved is difficult. As is said in Rittersbacher v. Board of Supervisors, 220 Cal. 535, 543, 32 P.2d 135, 139:
'Obviously the enormous extent of the task can afford no justification for an illegal tax.'
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for misconduct in a criminal case where a prosecutor argued that reasonable doubt was not a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of proof for a prosecutor to argue that a reasonable doubt standard is reasonable? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a reasonable probability of a more favourable result under the reasonable beyond reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
Is reasonable cause reasonable cause sufficient to warrantless arrest? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the rule of reasonableness in the context of the reasonable use doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant can reasonably have reasonably anticipated the events leading up to the action? (California, United States of America)
Is the reasonable doubt instruction insufficient to support the definition of reasonable doubt in CALCRIM No. 220? (California, United States of America)
Is it improper for a prosecutor to argue that the prosecution has met its burden of overcome reasonable doubt on all elements? (California, United States of America)
